Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: a style question
Message-ID: <MMD65CB@xds13.ferranti.com>
Date: 13 Oct 90 00:19:20 GMT
References: <1990Oct6.231143.28186@zoo.toronto.edu> <65263@lanl.gov> <EYC66N8@xds13.ferranti.com> <MEISSNER.90Oct12120812@osf.osf.org>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 9

In article <EYC66N8@xds13.ferranti.com> peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
> Talking of contrary to observed fact: the PDP-8 had no part in the
> development of the C programming language. Perhaps you're thinking
> of the PDP-11.

In article <MEISSNER.90Oct12120812@osf.osf.org> meissner@osf.org (Michael Meissner) writes:
> Or if you know your UNIX pre-history, the PDP-7.

Hold on, wasn't the PDP-7 version entirely assembly?
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
+1 713 274 5180.   'U`
peter@ferranti.com