Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!know!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!noao!arizona!debray From: debray@cs.arizona.edu (Saumya K. Debray) Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog Subject: Re: SICStus prolog vs. SBprolog? Summary: Sicstus is much better Message-ID: <26528@megaron.cs.arizona.edu> Date: 18 Oct 90 14:35:36 GMT References: <40304@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson Lines: 13 > I am interested if anyone has compared these two prologs; what are > their relative merits? SICStus Prolog is in general much better than SB-Prolog: it's faster, has a garbage collector and stack expander, and has much better support. It also supports primitives such as freeze/1 that are unavailable in SB-prolog. Also, I believe that it's practically free for educational institutions. -- Saumya Debray CS Department, University of Arizona, Tucson internet: debray@cs.arizona.edu uucp: uunet!arizona!debray