Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!timbuk!cs.umn.edu!uc!noc.MR.NET!msi.umn.edu!umeecs!umich!yale!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!pacbell.com!pacbell!well!tenney
From: mnemonic@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Mike Godwin)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.news
Subject: Re: Evidence (was Re: Musing on Constitutionality)
Message-ID: <21203@well.sf.ca.us>
Date: 22 Sep 90 13:49:25 GMT
References: <8306@helios.TAMU.EDU> <26938:Sep1814:48:2390@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <4572@qip.UUCP> <8418@helios.TAMU.EDU> <4619@qip.UUCP>
Sender: tenney@well.sf.ca.us
Reply-To: mnemonic@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Mike Godwin)
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
Lines: 15
Approved: comp-org-eff-news@well.sf.ca.us

In article <4619@qip.UUCP> john@qip.UUCP (John Moore) writes:
>
>It is true that the Pentagon Papers were not for the public's eyes. However,
>they were not of criminal value (unlike credit card numbers) and did
>bear on major public issues.

Actually, the federal government argued strongly for the position that
the Pentagon Papers should be regarded as stolen *property*.


--Mike


Mike Godwin, UT Law School  |"If the doors of perception were cleansed
mnemonic@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu | every thing would appear to man as it is,
(512) 346-4190              | infinite."
                            |                 --Blake