Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!umich!accuvax.nwu.edu!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!eecs.nwu.edu!phil From: phil@eecs.nwu.edu (William LeFebvre) Newsgroups: comp.org.sug Subject: Re: comp.sys.sun Message-ID: <298@casbah.acns.nwu.edu> Date: 9 Oct 90 14:27:31 GMT References: <1990Oct8.184908@mathcs.emory.edu> Sender: news@casbah.acns.nwu.edu Reply-To: phil@eecs.nwu.edu (William LeFebvre) Organization: EECS Department, Northwestern University Lines: 21 In article <1990Oct8.184908@mathcs.emory.edu>, km@mathcs.emory.edu (Ken Mandelberg) writes: |>I'm skeptical that any moderation scheme will end up timely enough even |>if it is officially funded. I suggest that comp.sys.sun become an unmoderated |>reflector, and the moderation efforts be applied to filtering it for |>the sun-spots digests.... Although this is mot quite the right place for this discussion, let me quickly say that the last time I talked to Bob Greene he said that he was throwing out about half of the messages that he received. That would imply that the comp.sys.sun volume would about double if it went unmoderated. Just food for thought.... (I am speaking for myself and no one else.) William LeFebvre Computing Facilities Manager and Analyst Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Northwestern University