Xref: utzoo comp.unix.sysv386:1339 comp.os.minix:12908 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!dimacs.rutgers.edu!rutgers!usc!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!cci632!tvf From: tvf@cci632.UUCP (Tom Frauenhofer) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,comp.os.minix Subject: Re: 286 -> 386sx Upgrades Message-ID: <40997@cci632.UUCP> Date: 18 Oct 90 12:50:12 GMT References: <40019@cci632.UUCP> <1990Sep21.144108.1098@pmafire.UUCP> <1990Sep25.152828.7408@pmafire.UUCP> <15261@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> Reply-To: tvf@cci632.UUCP (Tom Frauenhofer) Distribution: na Organization: Computer Consoles, Inc., An STC Icon, Rochester, NY Lines: 40 In article <15261@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> wilker@descartes.math.purdue.edu.UUCP (Clarence Wilkerson) writes: > But can you actually get your hands on a 386sx board. Yes, but it's getting hard. >About two weeks ago I decided totake the plunge and buy one. >I sat down with my 800 page COMPUTER SHOPPER, and called each >ad that had a 80386sx MB for less than $400. No place had any >in stock at the advertised price...Treasure Chest claimed their >$295 price was a "misprint" and the real price was $375. Others Try Hokkins Systemation in San Jose, CA. They've got a 16 MHz 386sx for $335 dollars. I just got it a week ago from them, it works good, uses the NEAT chipset. Also Hokkins was pretty good in giving me all the technical info I wanted before I bought, they shipped when promised, and the little suport I needed to get it up and running was good (much better than the place I bought my 286 board from several years ago, anyway). And they made sure that I knew what my system power requirements would be for the configuration I was planning to use. Their address/phone number is: Hokkins Systemation, Inc. 131 East Brokaw Road San Jose, CA 95112 (408) 436-8303 FAX: (408) 436-3021 I've no relation to them, just a statisfied customer. >said that due to the shortage of chips, they were only selling >"bare bones" systems... MB. case, Power supply.. for several hundred >more. One place I called (not Hokkins) said that Intel was phasing out the 16 MHz 386sx chips in favor of the 20 MHz chips, but that 20 MHz production volumes were still too low to meed the demand. He claimed that this was because the margins on the 16 MHz chips were a little lower than Intel liked and that this was their way of increasing their profit margins on the sx. I don't know how true this is, sounds plausible to me. -- Thomas V. Frauenhofer, WA2YYW ccicpg!cci632!tvf@uunet.uu.net tvf1477@ma.cs.rit.edu "Little cockroach on the wall/Don't you have no friends at all? Doesn't anybody love you?/God will love you! (SQUISH!)"