Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!att!mcdchg!ddsw1!corpane!sparks From: sparks@corpane.UUCP (John Sparks) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Lharc is no good. Message-ID: <3377@corpane.UUCP> Date: 9 Oct 90 16:28:14 GMT References: <1990Oct4.133454.25942@cs.umu.se> Organization: Corpane Industries Inc., Louisville, KY Lines: 22 jita@polaris.utu.fi (Marko Katajisto) writes: >> I have seen a lot of postings complaining about lharc lately. >> The program is poorly written and you should use some other >Well well, what can I say... I've used lharc rather heavily for a while now >and have nothing negative to say about it. I've used lharc in UNIX and in my >PS. My whole 25-meg PD library ic compressed with lharc simply because it's the >best available tool for it... :) Not only that, but 99% of all software on 99% of the BBS's in the USA is LHARCed, so it is a standard whether one wants it to be or not. I have had no trouble with it. Jorgan might be confusing it with LHWARP, which does seem to have some bugs in it (re: all the trouble people have had with the commodore 64 emulator file on abcfd) -- John Sparks |D.I.S.K. Public Access Unix System| Multi-User Games, Email sparks@corpane.UUCP |PH: (502) 968-DISK 24Hrs/2400BPS | Usenet, Chatting, =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-|7 line Multi-User system. | Downloads & more. A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of----Ogden Nash