Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!munnari.oz.au!murdu!ucsvc.ucs.unimelb.edu.au!wehi!baxter_a
From: BAXTER_A@wehi.dn.mu.oz
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: A Correction!
Message-ID: <14151@wehi.dn.mu.oz>
Date: 12 Oct 90 10:39:09 GMT
References: <43.27132af6@vger.nsu.edu>
Organization: Walter & Eliza Hall Institute
Lines: 17

In article <43.27132af6@vger.nsu.edu>, manes@vger.nsu.edu writes:
> Thanks Dan for pointing out something to me in email.
>  
> Folks I made a speculation that I certainly can not stand by.
>  
> I said that I did not believe that Commodore was going to support 2.0
> on the Amiga 500, I said it in such a way that it appeared that I had
> some inside source.  I have heard it several times but from lots of
> people.  
>  
> What I meant to say in the original post is that Commodore has not
> announced a 2.0 upgrade for the 500.  
>  

Wrong. They have anounced it. What they haven't anounced is _WHEN_.

Regards Alan