Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!wuarchive!uunet!nuchat!sugar!peter
From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: CALL FOR LOCAL DISCUSSION: Split the c.s.a group more?
Message-ID: <6801@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Date: 15 Oct 90 04:21:22 GMT
References: <1990Oct6.051722.7143@zorch.SF-Bay.ORGKD> <3378@corpane.UUCP>
Reply-To: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston
Lines: 10

In article <3378@corpane.UUCP> sparks@corpane.UUCP (John Sparks) writes:
> You realize, don't you, that splitting up the groups won't make it easier
> to keep up with, it will end up being worse, as each and every group will
> generate MORE postings, rather than less. So each supbgroup will have as
> much traffic as comp.sys.amiga does now. :-)

Yeh, but by that time c.s.a would have outperformed alt.sex.pictures.
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
<peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>.