Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!nuchat!sugar!peter
From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: CALL FOR LOCAL DISCUSSION: Split the c.s.a group more?
Message-ID: <6802@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Date: 15 Oct 90 04:30:54 GMT
References: <1990Oct6.051722.7143@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <1990Oct8.055618.27507@IRO.UMontreal.CA> <Oct.12.14.22.15.1990.17190@pilot.njin.net> <Oct.12.15.25.03.1990.19780@pilot.njin.net>
Reply-To: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston
Lines: 20

In article <Oct.12.15.25.03.1990.19780@pilot.njin.net> limonce@pilot.njin.net (Tom Limoncelli) writes:
> comp.sys.amiga.misc          Replace comp.sys.amiga
> comp.sys.amiga.software.dev  For programmers (replaces comp.sys.amiga.tech)

comp.sys.amiga.programmer. Why create a new level?

> comp.sys.amiga.software      For the users
> comp.sys.amiga.games         Same as it is now
> comp.sys.amiga.hardware      Same as it is now

comp.sys.amiga.forsale, too. It might not be that high, but forsale and
wanted messages have a high irritation value. .forsale? .wanted? .trade?

And I think a .rumors or .futures group would absorb several of your
categories and put it into the top few.

If this goes on we'll need a .config group as well. :->
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
<peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>.