Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!ucbvax!pasteur!cory.Berkeley.EDU!navas From: navas@cory.Berkeley.EDU (David C. Navas) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Wrong board size for Amiga 3000 Message-ID: <28806@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> Date: 15 Oct 90 20:04:09 GMT References: <12879@encore.Encore.COM> <1990Oct15.074829.27115@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU Reply-To: navas@cory.Berkeley.EDU Lines: 30 In article <1990Oct15.074829.27115@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> jdobbs@director.beckman.uiuc.edu (Jim Dobbs) writes: >I was told this directly by the representatives of BOTH NewTek (the >toaster people) AND Digital Creations (DCTV, SuperGen, etc.) > >Apparently there is ANOTHER problem totally separate from the SIZE >limitation, (which is also true, by the by) - that is that due to >Commodore-Amiga's clever placement of another expansion slot directly >adjacent to the Video slot (about 1/2" away) there is a BIG PROBLEM >with RF interference for Video devices. He said it would take a >Faraday shield to cut this interference down to MINIMALLY ACCEPTABLE >LEVELS, which would in turn create a HEAT problem. Well, I don't know about that. It certainly is possible, but from the outside of this box, the RF noise is at least 10 times lower than my A500. I can actually watch TV, which is a lot more than I could do with my A500 on... If you need to shield from the other slot, why not shield the slot, not your board? Hasn't this occurred to any of those "representative?" >I understand that if you even try to OPEN a HIRES/OVERSCAN screen on >the A3000, it Gurus... If this info was from the same "reps," they should be shot.... The things which have bombed for me are things that would bomb on *any* 68030 platform. This last piece is so mis-informative, that it puts your other concerns in grave doubt. See Peter Cherna's post as well... David Navas navas@sim.berkeley.edu "Excuse my ignorance, but I've been run over by my train of thought." -me