Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu!greg
From: greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Greg Harp)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re:  Macs etc.
Message-ID: <38365@ut-emx.uucp>
Date: 17 Oct 90 03:58:36 GMT
References: <33695@nigel.ee.udel.edu>
Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp
Reply-To: greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Greg Harp)
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
Lines: 23

In article <33695@nigel.ee.udel.edu> fhwri%CONNCOLL.BITNET@cunyvm.cuny.edu writes:
>Just so you know, the WB 2.0 can hold its head up QUITE proudly next to
>the Mac's interface. The clunkiness if 1.3 (which we all love if we're
>true Amigoids, even if we wince when we see the admittedly elegant Mac...)
                ^^^^ ^^ ^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^ ^^^
>is gone, replaced by something VERY nice-looking, and VERY powerful.
>                                                --rw
>                                                fhwri@conncoll.bitnet


Speak for yourself.  I've always disliked the cutesy Mac OS.  It's TOO 
detached from the machine.  There's user-friendly OS's and then there's
absurd OS's.  If there ever was a condescending OS, it's the Mac's OS.  It
feels too much like a toy to be a computer.  And finally, there's NO SHELL!
ARG!!!!!!!!!!!!

[I like shells, ok? :-) ]

Greg
---------------Greg-Harp---------------greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu----------------
AMIGA! //  
      // Don't you just hate those long signature files?  I mean, there oughta
    \X/  be a law.  If I were in control, .sigs would get cut off if they were