Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!psuvax1!rutgers!cmcl2!sbcs!max!greendog From: greendog@max.physics.sunysb.edu (Michael D Fischer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: CALL FOR LOCAL DISCUSSION: Split the c.s.a group more? Message-ID: <1990Oct16.181640.18895@max.physics.sunysb.edu> Date: 16 Oct 90 18:16:40 GMT References: <51731.655797309@atronx.UUCP> <6810@sugar.hackercorp.com> Reply-To: greendog@max.physics.sunysb.edu (Michael D Fischer) Organization: Institute for Theoretical Physics, SUNY at Stony Brook Lines: 18 I don't think splitting the newsgroup up more is the best/only solution to the overcrowding of articles on comp.sys.amiga... If people used the current divisions of the group properly the problem might not be as bad. For example, today I read about 10 articles on c.s.a about the 1950 monitor jitter. Don't these belong on comp.sys.amiga.hardware? There are also lots of articles that I read in all three c.s.a groups. WHY CROSSPOST THEM? That defeats the purpose of splitting a group, and just takes up more disk space and reader time. Lets see if we can use what we have correctly before trying something new (which would suffer from these same problems!) Michael -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Michael D. Fischer | greendog@max.physics.sunysb.edu - - S.U.N.Y. at Stony Brook | mfische@csserv1.ic.sunysb.edu - -------------------------------------------------------------------------