Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!clyde.concordia.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!crdgw1!ge-dab!tarpit!bilver!bill
From: bill@bilver.UUCP (Bill Vermillion)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: CALL FOR LOCAL DISCUSSION: Split the c.s.a group more?
Keywords: newsgroups
Message-ID: <1108@bilver.UUCP>
Date: 15 Oct 90 05:12:50 GMT
References: <583@DIALix.oz.au> <1990Oct9.002011.18060@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <1990Oct10.021956.24856@servalan.uucp>
Reply-To: bill@bilver.UUCP (Bill Vermillion)
Organization: W. J. Vermillion - Winter Park, FL
Lines: 27

In article <1990Oct10.021956.24856@servalan.uucp> ben@servalan.uucp (Ben Mesander) writes:
>I suggest that we start a new group, comp.sys.amiga.newgroups, that we can
>move this thread about making new groups into. It'd lower the traffic in
>comp.sys.amiga by quite a bit.
>

Discussions like this belong in news.groups, not in the system
hierarchy.  I just came into this group to post the previous
message because I got new groups today that I don't beleive were
ever discussed in the news.groups section.   This affects those of
us who administer systems, because we can't read all, but we do try
to keep up with the news sections to better adminster the machines.

I don't beleive I saw the new group proposals in the voting list
that was posted last week, but I may be wrong.

>I vote for more groups. This groups is unreadable as it is. I read it on a
>friends Mac running A/UX, so I don't get all the traffic sent to my Amiga
>running AmigaUUCP. And no, AmigaUUCP's news reader does not select threads
>out of the whole morass very well.
>
>ben@epmooch.UUCP


-- 
Bill Vermillion - UUCP: uunet!tarpit!bilver!bill
                      : bill@bilver.UUCP