Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!cbnewsl!coco
From: coco@cbnewsl.att.com (felix.a.lugo)
Subject: Unhappy Amiga Owner
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 90 16:19:20 GMT
Message-ID: <1990Oct17.161920.9749@cbnewsl.att.com>
Keywords: Amiga, WB 2.0, Commodore, UNIX SVR4
Lines: 34

	I would like to know what's going on with WB 2.0 for the Amiga 2000.
	Is it available yet?  Will it become available this year?  What's
	happening Commodore?  What's taking you so long?????
	I've seen it running on Amiga 3000s, so why can't I run it on my
	2000?  Commodore, are you willingly delaying the release of WB 2.0
	for lower model Amigas until A3000 sales increase?
	The WB 1.3 release is "ancient" by today's standard!
	Also, what's the scoop on UNIX SVR4?

	I've followed Commodore's line of computers for a very long time.
	My first computer was a VIC-20, followed by a C64, C128, A1000, and
	A2000.  I've never owned a computer that didn't have the Commodore
	or Amiga logos in front.  I really don't know how much longer this
	is going to last, though, with the new systems introduced by companies
	such as Apple and NeXT which out-perform even the new Amiga 3000,
	at comparable prices.

	Also, I don't understand Commodore's PR.  Two weeks ago I learned of
	the new line of computers offered by Apple.  This week I've seen
	at least five (5) different TV commercials showing them off.  Ask
	me if I have seen a single commercial for the Amiga 3000??!!
	Is Commodore so "secure" that they can afford not to advertise their
	systems?

	I know I'll be getting tons and tons of replies for this post, but
	people, wake up and smell the coffee!!!!  Commodore is losing
	ground at an astonishing rate!  Take this post seriously, and not
	as another FLAME directed at Commodore.

					Very unhappy,
						Felix A. Lugo
						coco@ihlpy.att.com
						att!ihlpy!coco