Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!iuvax!valnet!joseph
From: joseph@valnet.UUCP (Joseph P. Hillenburg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: OK, now I'm annoyed about Soundtracker
Keywords: soundtracker poorly written, 2000
Message-ID: <VPD8q6w163w@valnet>
Date: 17 Oct 90 21:35:30 GMT
References: <38346@ut-emx.uucp>
Organization: Valley BBS Network
Lines: 18

Just every one remember that MED doesn't share any code with SoundTracker 
and therefore is legal. Check out the code. You have to work in 
assembler to  hack ST/NT, but you can use C for MED. That should prove 
it. (In my opinion, if MED had the sampler, and it worked, as well as 
work on the A3000 (possibly with an auto-patch for accererated machines), 
it'd blow all the other ST type programs, SoundFX certainly included, 
competely away.) I've used quite a few of them, so experience is no 
problem. I, can cofirm by the way they look alike, that:

EAS SoundTracker 1.0 = DOC SoundTracker 2.5 = NoiseTracker 2.01
SoundFX's only real improvement is that it's more stable (itn's only 
guru'ed on me once), its actually useable, and it multitasks.

-Joseph Hillenburg

UUCP: ...iuvax!valnet!joseph
ARPA: valnet!joseph@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu
INET: joseph@valnet.UUCP