Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!emory!gatech!purdue!haven!decuac!shlump.nac.dec.com!bacchus.pa.dec.com!buzzer.enet.dec.com!gerber From: gerber@buzzer.enet.dec.com (Robert M. Gerber) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: AmigaVision and its database features.... Keywords: AmigaVision, database, bug? Message-ID: <1990Oct18.153303@buzzer.enet.dec.com> Date: 18 Oct 90 20:00:42 GMT Sender: news@wrl.dec.com (News) Reply-To: gerber@oldjon.enet.dec.com Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Lines: 39 Last week I picked up version 1.53G of AmigaVision and already have a few questions about it... I set up a database using the facilities in AmigaVision with the following fields: Field Type Length Key ======= ====== ====== === System String 20 #1 Number Number 4 #2 Title String 48 No When I use Key#1 to access the database the records come back sorted properly. When I tried using key#2 as the access reference, they were returned in exactly the same order. When I swapped the key ordering, the database still returned all the records in the same order when accessing by either key. I would have expected the the database would be returned by the referencing Key and if there were duplicates, then sort by the Key not referenced. Am I wrong in this assumption? I though the purpose of multiple keys was to allow you to access the database in different orders.... I am trying to generate two different reports, the first sorted on the first key, then the second. The second report I just want sorted on the second key, with the little bit of duplication on this key sorted by the first key. Can this be done with AmigaVision? Is this a bug? A feature? ByTheWay: Has anyone got any AmigaVision applications that they are willing to share? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------- Robert M. Gerber UUCP: ...!decwrl!oldjon.enet!gerber INET: gerber@oldjon.enet.dec.com Any opinions represented here are definetly not those of my employer. Come to think of it, they may not be mine either!