Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uunet!sky!brian From: brian@sky.COM (Brian Pelletier) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.games Subject: Re: Quality Keywords: Amiga graphics? They look OK to me... Message-ID: <740@sky.COM> Date: 12 Oct 90 19:44:43 GMT References: <1990Oct11.164358.20406@warwick.ac.uk> Reply-To: brian@sky.COM (Brian Pelletier) Organization: SKY Computers, Chelmsford MA Lines: 33 In article <1990Oct11.164358.20406@warwick.ac.uk> esucv@warwick.ac.uk (Blitter) writes: >Hi, > I find that most Amiga games are INFERIOR to many which appeared on the 64, >not just in gameplay terms but GRAPHICS also. This is because almost all 64 Really? Have you put a C64 next to your Amiga and really viewed them side- by-side lately? I had the same impression you did for a while, but once I saw them running together there was really no comparison. The Amiga graphics are almost *always* better, usually by quite a wide margin. Games like Shadow of the Beast (I & II) and Turrican have tremendous character animation as well. > Also, while the sound on the Amiga is technically superior to the 64's, >most of the music tends to use the same old Soundtracker voices, hence giving >a 'samey' feel to the music. The 64 had some great composers working on it >(Rob Hubbard, Martin Galway), where are they now??? This was a pet peeve of mine for a while too. With the ability to easily store 'digitized' sounds, it seemed all the creativity was taken out of many game soundtracks. Advertisers even *boasted* the amount of digitized sounds in their games. I always thought that a few tastefully done digitized sounds enhanced a game, while a whole digitized soundtrack usually ruined it. Again, the titles I mentioned above (as well as a lot of others) have much better music/sound effects than similar games from a year or 2 ago. Just my opinion.... +=========================================================================+ | Brian Pelletier Disclaimer: These are MY opinions, not SKY's.| | Sky Computer | | UUCP - brian@sky.com | +=========================================================================+