Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!wuarchive!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!ucbvax!pasteur!cory.Berkeley.EDU!navas
From: navas@cory.Berkeley.EDU (David C. Navas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Monitors
Message-ID: <28760@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 14 Oct 90 00:37:24 GMT
References: <2954@isc-br.ISC-BR.COM>
Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: navas@cory.Berkeley.EDU
Lines: 27

In article chucky@isc-br.ISC-BR.COM (Chuck Yorlano) writes:
>Please email any suggestions.

Sorry, but a lot of people ask for this information quite frequently, and
thought this would be of general interest.

>Sony 1304
>Samsung Multisync
>Nec 3D
>Taxan 770 plus
>Can anyone comment on any of these.

I have seen the Sony 1304, Seiko (1450? -- the one that uses Sony's tube), and
the NEC 3D.
For the price I'd choose either over the NEC3D.  To get to its 1024x768 mode,
the NEC 3D has to interlace its display.  Also the Sony has a .25 dot pitch,
the NEC's is .28.  Unless you want your interlaced display back, I wouldn't
suggest the NEC 3D.

I'm personally waiting for the NEC 4D, anyone know where I can BUY one NOW?
[Nobody seems to know when NEC will start to ship them again...]

There is a PC magazine with an April and May issue about monitors that might
be worthwhile to check out.  [Whichever PC mag. that has PC Labs report in it]

David Navas                                   navas@sim.berkeley.edu
"Excuse my ignorance, but I've been run over by my train of thought."  -me