Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga.tech:15055 comp.sys.amiga.hardware:4015
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!peck
From: peck@ral.rpi.edu (Joseph Peck)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech,comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Possible E-Clock fixes
Message-ID: <8+X%=G$@rpi.edu>
Date: 12 Oct 90 16:40:19 GMT
References: <1990Oct11.193142.13719@ecst.csuchico.edu> <1990Oct12.124753.14723@sisd.kodak.com>
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY
Lines: 21

In article <1990Oct12.124753.14723@sisd.kodak.com> jeh@sisd.kodak.com (Ed Hanway) writes:
>However, the 68000 can also run synchronous bus cycles which end on an edge of
>the E clock.  Obviously, if you speed up the CPU, that speeds up the E clock,
>and that makes the synchronous cycles run faster, but only if the peripherals
>which use synchronous cycles can run that fast.  In the Amiga, the 8520's
>use sychronous cycles and are not spec'd to run much faster than 7MHz,
>certainly not 14MHz.
> 

A quick question here.  Is it only the 8520's that use the E clock?
(I only have a 1000, and my roomate con't find his 2000's schematics....)
I don't have a solution for the E-clock yet, I am just trying to 
understand what is going on a little better.

>
>Ed Hanway
>uunet!sisd!jeh

Thanks,
Joe Peck
peck@ral.rpi.edu