Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!unsvax!uns-helios!alfter From: alfter@uns-helios.nevada.edu (SCOTT ALFTER) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2 Subject: Re: MacLCw/IIe emulator Message-ID: <2176@unsvax.NEVADA.EDU> Date: 18 Oct 90 21:45:46 GMT References: <9010171437.AA06284@apple.com> <1990Oct18.000603.18849@utstat.uucp> <7952@darkstar.ucsc.edu> Sender: news@unsvax.NEVADA.EDU Reply-To: alfter@uns-helios.uucp (SCOTT ALFTER) Organization: Univ of Nevada System Computing Services - Las Vegas Lines: 28 In article <7952@darkstar.ucsc.edu> unknown@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (The Unknown User) writes: >[stuff deleted] > If I'm even in the "same ballpark (with the truth)" about my >presumptions about the //c+ vs the //e, then it seems the //e is redundant. Not so fast, there! Can you expand a IIc Plus? How much RAM can you stick in it? A RamWorks III is supposed to be able to take up to 16 megs, plus RGB and a 65816. How fast can you make a IIc Plus go? A Zip Chip probably won't work in it, and I know a TransWarp III won't work. How about hard disks? Chinook's SmartPort drives are interesting devices from an engineering standpoint, but they don't stand a chance against SCSI hard disks. What about other types of add-ons, such as music cards or A/D-D/A cards? Five years ago I picked a IIe over a IIc for one simple reason: the IIe can be easily and cheaply upgraded and expanded. The same, IMHO, holds true for any comparison between a IIe and IIc Plus. Given a choice between those two computers, I would still buy a IIe. (Add a IIGS to those choices, though, and I would probably decide differently. :-) ) You might also consider how the other half lives: the Mac didn't sell too well until Apple made one (two, actually: the SE and Mac II) that had an expansion capability. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scott Alfter _/_ / v \ Apple II: Internet: alfter@uns-helios.nevada.edu ( ( the power to be your best! GEnie: S.ALFTER \_^_/