Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!rutgers!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!sunc5.cs.uiuc.edu!carroll
From: carroll@sunc5.cs.uiuc.edu (Alan M. Carroll)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Any dirt on Zeos?
Message-ID: <1990Oct17.232313.21538@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 17 Oct 90 23:23:13 GMT
References: <4181@sactoh0.SAC.CA.US>
Sender: news@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News)
Reply-To: carroll@sunc5.cs.uiuc.edu (Alan M. Carroll)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Lines: 12

I bought a Zeos 16Mhz '386 Tower about, oh, 2 years or so ago. I've had some
problems with it. So far, it's had the motherboard, power supply, and disk
drive replaced. In all cases, Zeos did respond promptly, without hassle, when
I finally got around to calling them, although recently (with the disk drive,
which was a Seagate 277R0, which explains a lot) I had quite a bit of trouble
actually getting through to the service department. Once I made the connection,
they quickly sent me a new (277R1) disk drive, and it works fine now. I have a
NEC MultiSync on the system, so I can't talk about their monitors. I do like the
system, and right now my lovely wife is running Mach 2.5 on it (it used to run
DOS and 386/ix 2.0.2 & X11R3.1). I don't use it anymore primarily because it's
a 16 Mhz machine, and I have a 25Mhz Logix box. Overall, I like Zeos, and would
buy from them again.