Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!timbuk!cs.umn.edu!uc!shamash!paul
From: paul@u02.svl.cdc.com (Paul Kohlmiller)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: SuperLaserSpool Problems
Message-ID: <26911@shamash.cdc.com>
Date: 11 Oct 90 20:27:29 GMT
References: <1990Oct9.210343.3330@cbnewsj.att.com>
Sender: news@shamash.cdc.com
Distribution: na
Lines: 23

dsk@cbnewsj.att.com (donald.s.klett) writes:
>tech support back today, and it was suggested that the system heap was not
>big enough.  I had this type of problem in the past with DiskTop.  So I will
>use HeapFixer and enlarge the system heap.  Maybe it will help.
>So far I am not impressed with SLS and if the heap enlargement does not help,
>I will send it back for a refund.

I also had a lot of problems with SLS. Increasing the heap size did help as did
increasing the application size of Word 4.0 which might have been the culprit.
Still, SLS had problems when going through the network to the Apple LW NTx and
it had problems with heavy-duty Postscript files. It may not be the fault of 
SLS but I stopped using it and went back to Apple's Print Monitor. This still
has problems with some PS files. I also have the option of sending my output
to a Print Spooler Station (i.e. a dedicated MAC that handles printing and
spooling, etc.). This works less than SLS so I stopped that and now everyone
else attached to that Laser hates me.
Good Luck. [ I hope that 5GS does a better job with SLS. ]

--
     // Paul H. Kohlmiller           //  "Cybers, Macs and Mips"         //
     // Control Data Corporation     // Internet: paul@u02.svl.cdc.com   //
     // All comments are strictly    // America Online: Paul CDC         //
     // my own.                      // Compuserve: 71170,2064           //