Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!bu.edu!m2c!umvlsi!dime!lee From: lee@quincy.cs.umass.edu (Peter Lee) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc Subject: Re: SuperLaserSpool Problems Message-ID: Date: 15 Oct 90 14:21:59 GMT References: <1990Oct9.210343.3330@cbnewsj.att.com> <966@sppy00.UUCP> Sender: news@dime.cs.umass.edu Distribution: na Organization: /u/zoo/lee/.organization Lines: 62 In-reply-to: glf@sppy00.UUCP's message of 10 Oct 90 20:44:45 GMT In article <966@sppy00.UUCP> glf@sppy00.UUCP (Hill) writes: From: glf@sppy00.UUCP (Hill) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc Date: 10 Oct 90 20:44:45 GMT References: <1990Oct9.210343.3330@cbnewsj.att.com> In article <1990Oct9.210343.3330@cbnewsj.att.com> dsk@cbnewsj.att.com (donald.s.klett) writes: >I have a Mac SE, 4MB, HP DeskJet, about 10 INITs, MacPrint 1.2. Also I am >running ATM 2.0. At first the SLS would completely monopolize the system. >I talked with 5th Generation (Supermac sold SLS) tech support and they >suggested [... suggestions and (very little) results removed ...] And I thought it was just me. I'm running a Mac+ with System 6.0.3, 2.5 MEG and a LaserWriterIISC with about 8-10 VERY standard, VERY stable INITs, as well as ATM and TypeAlign (which is not to imply that these last two aren't stable ... they are). When SLS2.0 is spooling a document, it can take 4, 6, or even 8 seconds for the application to get control JUST so I can pull down a menu. Move-to-Menu, Point, Click, W A I T A L O N G T I M E, Menu-shows-up AARRGGHHH! . . . =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Greg Feldman-Hill {seismo|cbosgd}!osu-cis!sppy00!glf -OR- gfh@rsch.oclc.org OCLC - Online Computer Library Center ... Dublin, Ohio "If winning is not important, then Commander, why keep score?" -- Worf -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- I've been using SLS with ATM 2.0, about 11 other inits (including Moire and SuperClock), system 6.0.4., and my DeskWriter for about a month now without any problems. I have a 4 meg SE (pre-SuperDrive), run under Multi-Finder, and allocate a 256K print-buffer by default. My only complaint is the $(*&(@#$ non-standard WDEF they use for the LaserQueue DA, which puts the close box in the wrong place. In any event, the best thing to do in any situation like this, rather than assuming all of your other inits are 'standard' or 'stable' is to remove them all and see if the problem persists. If it goes away, re-introduce them one-by-one until it returns. Various INIT-choosers, such as the INIT-CDEV make this task much easier. BTW, I did find one definite bug in SLS that only occurred using HyperCard 1.2.5. and the ImageWriter driver, so there may be other driver-specific bugs in SLS... -- |- Peter E. Lee, Staff Assistant -| | Software Development Lab at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst | | lee@cs.umass.edu or Fuligin@umass.bitnet or (413) 256-1329 | "When you expect whistles, it's flutes. When you expect flutes, it's whistles"