Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucsd!ucbvax!agate!ziploc!eps From: eps@toaster.SFSU.EDU (Eric P. Scott) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Thoughts on InterOp 90 Summary: Where was NeXT? Message-ID: <893@toaster.SFSU.EDU> Date: 16 Oct 90 05:00:22 GMT Reply-To: eps@cs.SFSU.EDU (Eric P. Scott) Organization: San Francisco State University Lines: 36 Just about everyone who's anyone in computer networking attended last week's InterOp 90 Conference and Exhibition. Attendance more than doubled from last year--23,000 this time around. Every major workstation vendor was represented, including all of NeXT's real and imagined competitors. NeXT Computer Inc. was conspicuously absent, although two 3rd Party vendors (Cayman and Novell) had NeXTs in their booths. Cayman used a N1000 as an NFS server for their GatorShare NFS<->AFP software. Novell had a NeXTstation, but I didn't take a close look at what they were using it for. I ran into a couple of NeXT employees on the Exhibition floor. One said, "this is the kind of show that makes Steve's flesh crawl." InterOp certainly makes a lot of vendors nervous--it's one time each year when nominally competing vendors have to prove they can work together. No canned demos here--it's all live on the real Internet. Attendees get to test what's being shown hands-on against other vendors at the show, and against their own systems at home. Certain "hot topics" warranted special demonstrations: For example, vendors with 10BaseT-compatible products set up a special "torture test" complete with "Network Hell." IMHO, a formal appearance by NeXT would have had a significant effect on NeXT's credibility, acceptance, and sales. InterOp, Inc. staff said this Exhibition generated 2 1/2 times the number of sales leads expected for a show this size. For all NeXT's talk about how they're going to revolutionize "interpersonal computing," why are they spending all their effort pushing PERSONAL COMPUTING applications? Apple and IBM wised up. It's time NeXT did too. -=EPS=- I don't think I need a disclaimer.