Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!thyme!kaleb From: kaleb@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov (Kaleb Keithley ) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,ba.windows.x Subject: Re: Running X windows on a 16MHz 386sx Message-ID: <1990Oct16.155020.1252@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov> Date: 16 Oct 90 15:50:20 GMT References: <1990Oct7.022705.12488@unixland.uucp> <1990Oct13.220633.8294@maths.tcd.ie> <1990Oct16.060422.17071@shawn.uucp> Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA Lines: 36 In article root@dlb.uucp (0000-Admin(0000)) writes: >In article tim@maths.tcd.ie (Timothy Murphy) writes: >>In bill@unixland.uucp (Bill Heiser) writes: >> >>>I doubt that a 16/20 MHz 386SX will be sufficient to run Xwindows, >>>although it may be OK for normal apps. >> >>I read recently a claim that a 386SX with lots of memory >>made a perfectly adequate Unix box (which I took to include X). >> >>It would be nice to hear from someone that has actually done this, >>in the real world. > >I would be very surprised if reasonable performance resulted from such a setup. >I am convinced that X could run, given 8 Meg of RAM, but it would be annoyingly >slow. At 4 Meg of RAM, there would probably be severe swapping problems. I've done it in the real world, using ESIX 3.2.C X11R3 on my 16mhz SX with both 4 and 8 meg. Four meg works, it's not pretty; every time you drag the cursor between windows the drive access light comes on as the thing starts to swap. With 8 meg it doesn't spend as much time swapping. I think the real bottleneck tho' is the VGA display on the 8mhz AT bus. After a year of living with the SX, I just upgraded to a 486 and, while all around faster, the display is still the weak link (it is a 16bit VGA.) What intrigues me the most is that the display performance for OS/2 is orders of magnitude better; the X server writers need to get a lot smarter about handling the VGA, especially bit blitting. BTW, I've heard that ESIX 3.2.D is substantially better in many areas including the X Server, I'm waiting for my update to arrive. -- Kaleb Keithley Jet Propulsion Labs kaleb@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov causing trouble again.