Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!rutgers!ub!canisius!pavlov
From: pavlov@canisius.UUCP (Greg Pavlov)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: Maxtor disks & DEC5000
Keywords: Help
Message-ID: <2940@canisius.UUCP>
Date: 18 Oct 90 01:44:13 GMT
References: <768@inesc.UUCP> <1990Oct11.211023.2207@decuac.dec.com> <1990Oct14.205157.27090@decuac.dec.com>
Organization: Canisius College, Buffalo N.Y. 14208
Lines: 18

In article <1990Oct14.205157.27090@decuac.dec.com>, mjr@hussar.dco.dec.com (Marcus J. Ranum) writes:
> In article <2933@canisius.UUCP> pavlov@canisius.UUCP (Greg Pavlov) writes:
> 
> >  I have played with the tunefs parameters many times  - particularly rotat-
> >  ional delay.  I have noticed that I do not see any difference ........ 
> 
> 	Yep, I've never managed to squeeze the legendary Massive Benefits
> of tweaking rotational delay out of the disks, either. ..........
> 


   So what is the rationale for proposing it as a possible solution for the
   original Maxtor problem ?  I still don't get it......



   greg pavlov, fstrf, amherst, ny
   pavlov@stewart.fstrf.org