Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!oliveb!bunker!hcap!hnews!115!778!Chip.Orange
From: Chip.Orange@f778.n115.z1.fidonet.org (Chip Orange)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: ARKENSTONE Response
Message-ID: <15030@bunker.UUCP>
Date: 17 Oct 90 04:49:22 GMT
Sender: news@bunker.UUCP
Reply-To: Chip.Orange@f778.n115.z1.fidonet.org
Distribution: misc
Organization: FidoNet node 1:115/778 - COPH-2 (BGMS), Chicago IL
Lines: 22
Approved: wtm@bunker.UUCP

Index Number: 11160

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

Sorry to but in here Les, but in your discussion of my article reviewing 
reading systems I beleive you have more than once crossed the fine line 
between disagreement and innuendo and personal attacks.  To be sure the 
article is just one mans opinion, but it is the opinion of a man who is 
neither financially interested in either company (as you have emplied) 
nor uninformed (since I have had several months with all three systems on 
a daily basis).  Youre being an Arkenstone representative, and only 
having one of the three systems, puts you on shakey ground to give 
credible criticism, and certainly doesn't qualify you to call the article 
a "tragedy".  Please don't take this tac in the future, and don't take 
portions of the article out of context.  Remember that Kurzweil got its 
lumps in the article, and Arkenstone got their cuttos as well.
  
     Chip Orange

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!115!778!Chip.Orange
Internet: Chip.Orange@f778.n115.z1.fidonet.org