Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!uw-beaver!mit-eddie!wuarchive!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!hpcc05!hp-ptp!davew
From: davew@hp-ptp.HP.COM (Dave_Waller)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: Re: Orthogonality in general
Message-ID: <1920002@hp-ptp.HP.COM>
Date: 12 Oct 90 00:45:20 GMT
References: <675@paladin.Owego.NY.US>
Organization: HP Pacific Technology Park - Sunnyvale, Ca.
Lines: 29

larry@kitty.UUCP (Larry Lippman) writes:
> In article <1920001@hp-ptp.HP.COM>, davew@hp-ptp.HP.COM (Dave_Waller) writes:
> > The answer to this is obvious. Frequency response in this situation is
> > described by the Putz-Schmuckmann function, integrated over the
> > frequency domain for time-invariancy.
> 
> 	I always thought that the Putz-Schmuckmann function was used to
> describe the instantaneous signal-grid transconductance of fallopian tubes.
> 

It is; however when the Putz-Schmuckmann function is integrated over the
TIME domain (assuming frequency invariancy), hyperbolic incongruities
cancel out (rather nicely, I might add), leaving behind a value
proportional to the instantaneous signal-grid transconductance of
fallopian tubes. The proportionality constant depends upon the age of
the woman in question.

> 	:-)
> 
> Larry Lippman @ Recognition Research Corp.  "Have you hugged your cat today?"
> VOICE: 716/688-1231   {boulder, rutgers, watmath}!ub!kitty!larry
> FAX:   716/741-9635                  {utzoo, uunet}!/      \aerion!larry
> ----------

:-) again.

Dave Waller  \  The opinions expressed are solely my own, and in no way
Hewlett-Packard Co.  \  represent those of my employer (but we all know
dave@hpdstma.ptp.hp.com | hplabs!hpdstma!dave  \  they should!)