Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!bu.edu!buit13!kwe From: kwe@buit13.bu.edu (Kent England) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans Subject: Re: Motorola wireless lan? Summary: This is spread spectrum technology Message-ID: <67070@bu.edu.bu.edu> Date: 25 Oct 90 14:23:23 GMT References: <418@bartal.CRLABS.COM> Sender: news@bu.edu.bu.edu Reply-To: kwe@buit13.bu.edu (Kent England) Followup-To: comp.dcom.lans Organization: Boston U. Information Technology Lines: 45 In article <418@bartal.CRLABS.COM> phillip@bartal.crlabs.com (Phillip M. Vogel) writes: > >---begin unauthorized quote from WSJ--- > "....a new method for sending data within buildings using >digital radio transmission......based on several components, >including an omnidirectional antenna, a miniaturized digital >transmitter and receiver You are describing one of several varieties of wireless LAN technology that will be coming to market in the near future. Unlike older technologies that sent radio signals on power lines or used infrared, these new technologies are based on a type of radio modulation invented many years ago for the military: spread spectrum technology. Spread spectrum involves spreading a "narrow" bandwidth signal across a much larger spectrum using pseudo-random number sequences known to both transmitter and receiver. The spectrum spreading improves signal to noise dramatically (if done right) in the presence of multi-path, which is a severe problem at these frequencies in the steel-lattice buildings most of us work in. But beware of corner cutting vendors whose spectrum spreading is just within FCC definitions. Not all implementations are created equal. Look for at least 10:1 spreading. More is better, but costly. You still have to install wire and repeater units, so you don't get rid of upfront costs altogether. What you will eliminate is the necessity of "installing" new nodes. The headache you get, of course, is you will have to look to find out who is using your radio LAN and you won't know til you look how crowded it is getting. And like cellular phones, the spectrum will get crowded and will be regulated eventually, so your systems are somewhat vulnerable to future interference. Remember the early cordless phones? I think we will have to build a lot of these systems before we can find out how many of these wireless LANs can share the same bandwidth space before the noise floor gets too high. Does anyone have an test data for how many wireless LANs can co-exist independently in the ether? --Kent England Boston University