Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!uw-beaver!mit-eddie!wuarchive!emory!att!att!watmath!maytag!xenitec!zswamp!root From: root@zswamp.fidonet.org (Geoffrey Welsh) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: Can we back up a sec? Message-ID: <2234.2727A6FD@zswamp.fidonet.org> Date: 25 Oct 90 18:07:43 GMT Organization: Izot's Swamp BBS - Kitchener, Ontario Lines: 49 In a message to All on Oct 24, George Robbins (grr@cbmvax.commodore.com ) wrote: >Message-ID: <15363@cbmvax.commodore.com> >Mode Files Characters Seconds C/Sec >PEP 21 5858185 4700 1246.4 >V.32 59 14904357 19764 754.11 Wonderful. Zackly what I needed. >Note that these numbers aren't too surprising, the 7500 char/sec >is about what you'd get one a direct connect at 9600 baud, Don't forget that the modems will have been using a synchronous framing technique (most likely MNP3 plus MNP4 for a couple of T2500s under V.32), which brings the 100% mark close to 1200 CPS (as opposed to 960 CPS for async framing over a 9600 bps null modem). If you take that into consideration, the 750 CPS rating is disappointing. >Increasing window size or packet size, or changing protocols I presume that you were using standard 64-byte packets; what window size were you using (7, 3, or 1)? Thanks for your reply! >help the V.32 get closer to 9600 BPS, but wouldn't do much >for the the PEP >mode unless the protocol was adaptable to PEP packetizing >charactersitics. Hmm, the 'e' protocol should work fine over a PEP modem *if* you are sure that your async connection to the TB is absolutely error-proof. It might even beat 'g' protocol spoofing performance... >Protocol experiments are difficult and don't neccesarily >help the average guy with a binary license. Sad but all too true. -- UUCP: watmath!xenitec!zswamp!root | 602-66 Mooregate Crescent Internet: root@zswamp.fidonet.org | Kitchener, Ontario FidoNet: SYSOP, 1:221/171 | N2M 5E6 CANADA Data: (519) 742-8939 | (519) 741-9553 MC Hammer, n. Device used to ensure firm seating of MicroChannel boards Try our new Bud 'C' compiler... it specializes in 'case' statements!