Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!apple!bionet!hayes.ims.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: DREUBEN@eagle.wesleyan.edu (Douglas Scott Reuben) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Cellular Airtime for Call-Forwarding Message-ID: <13891@accuvax.nwu.edu> Date: 22 Oct 90 05:07:01 GMT Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu Organization: TELECOM Digest Lines: 122 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 753, Message 1 of 6 Once again, Metro Mobile, the "A"/Nonwireline Cellular provider in Connecticut and Rhode Island, has proven to me that it has, in my opinion, the stupidest and rudest customer service people in the business. To those not "blessed" enough to use their service, this is the company that used to have a pretty flaky DMX to New York City, which never worked well, and was always overloaded. (A DMX allows one to roam into another area and still receive calls there, as well as, in some cases, call-forwaring, and other custom calling features...). After three letters to Metro, they finally managed to get it fixed in April, and has worked pretty well ever since. Good, right? Nope ... In May, for 3 days (a weekend plus Monday), they managed to cross-connect all of their 977 prefix numbers to the U.S. Sprint "950" access port. So not only could callers not get in touch with me, but they got a nice Sprint tone, and then had to pay for the calls since Sprint seems to return supervision on those calls. Great, another long letter asking for a refund of all those calls, etc. Last week, I get my bill, and it is *three* times what it normally is! So I take a closer look, and guess what? They apparently decided to start charging AIRTIME (not tolls/land charges, but airtime) for call-forwarding, something they never had done in the past, and something which I *specifically* asked about when I initially signed up for service. AND, they just started charging on Sept 14th .. NO notice, NO pamphlets in the mail, not even a phone call - On Sept 14th, suddenly, all call-forward calls have an airtime charge next to them! So I call up Metro Mobile, and ask: Me> "Why am I being charged airtime for forwarded calls?" Metro> "Oh, we always did that...". Me> "Uh...so why do all my bills for the past two years fail to have such charges?" Metro> "You're probably just reading them wrong..." (!!!!!!) Me> "Err ... yeah ... can I talk to your supervisor?" Metro> "It's not HER [superivsor's] fault you read your bills improperly!" (more !!!!!!!!) ....so I listen to dead air for a while, and then the superivsor, Sharon Ballard, comes on: Me> (repeat the whole thing about suddenly getting charged) Sharon> "Oh, we were having a software problem, we've corrected it now..." Me> "FOR TWO YEARS???!!!! - you've had this problem for two years and you only managed to correct it now?" (which, after thinking about it for a while, isn't all that implausible with Metro...! :-) ) Sharon> "Well, we charge it now, regardless..." After this delightful conversation, I figure it is time to write them yet another letter, explaining to them why I don't think I should pay a MONTHLY charge for Call-Forwarding ($4), as well as AIRTIME for forwarded calls. I believe I've read from the numerous posts on this subject that both systems in Chicago no longer charge airtime for call-forwarding, and was wondering if there are any other areas in North America where this is also the case. Metro's usual response to customer complaints is "Oh, but all the other systems do the same thing...", which is the answer I got when I asked what reason they had for charging DOUBLE airtime for Call-Waiting and Three-way calling. (Basically, they want to make some more money is what it came down to... - So much for competition in the Cellular industry! Neat little duopoly...). It would be nice if this time I could refute that argument by giving them a list of systems which are a bit more enlightened, and do not charge airtime for call-forwarding. I'd really appreciate just a brief note letting me know the name of the system and where it is located, if, as I said, there are any such systems. I'll summarize if anyone is interested. Thanks in advance for any/all help! P.S. Favorite Metro Mobile Quote: Me> "Hi, would you know the roam port number for Reno, Nevada?" Metro> "No, I don't...." Favorite Quote #2: Me> "I've notived on my bill a daily charge for using the Baltimore / Washington D.C. system, when, as you can see from my bill, I was in Westchester County, NY, at the time." Metro> "Were you near water?" Me> "Ummm...yeah...Long Island Sound...why?" Metro> "Oh, well THAT explains it - those signals travel VERY far over water...we get that all the time!" Me> "But Baltimore is 200 miles away!!!!" Metro> "But it's over *water*! - THAT'S what does it all the time!" (Maybe I should sign up with British Telecom in the UK so I can get service when I can afford to buy a boat, huh? I mean, the UK is only 3000 miles of "WATER" away!!! :-) ) (In all fairness, they have a technically superior system. It would be nice if they were able to match the quality of the service of their employees with the level of technical proficiency found in their network ... It would also be nice if they weren't such a bunch of cheap penny-pinchers who try to nickel and dime anything they can, and make up ridiculous excuses for it later on!) Doug dreuben@eagle.wesleyan.edu dreuben@wesleyan.bitnet