Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!bionet!hayes.ims.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: jtatum@gnh-porthole.cts.com (Jamie tatum)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: 950-xxxx From a COCOT -- Billable Call?
Message-ID: <13933@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 24 Oct 90 06:18:11 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 11
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 756, Message 2 of 12


Well we're lucky out here ... our pay phones do not charge for 800
numbers. Not only that, they're cheap at ten cents a call. (Local, of
course!)  I'm referring to Connecticut. You know, since David's
mailbox put up EBBS, I don't think there has been one netting
(Internet, etc.) board in all of Connecticut!


INET: jtatum@gnh-porthole.cts.com
UUCP: crash!pnet01!gnh-porthole!jtatum
ARPA: crash!pnet01!gnh-porthole!jtatum@nosc.mil