Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!bionet!hayes.ims.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: mikes@gammafax.gammalink.com (mike spann)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Two Residential Phones; Same Address and 'Owner'; One Bill?
Message-ID: <13935@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 22 Oct 90 19:14:13 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Reply-To: mike spann <gammafax!mikes@uunet.uu.net>
Organization: gammafax
Lines: 20
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 756, Message 4 of 12


In article <13831@accuvax.nwu.edu> dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com (David
Tamkin) writes:

>            I hesitate to think what would happen if I tried to mail a
>single check to their collection center in Lincoln, though: they'd
>probably credit the whole payment to only one number and I'd need to
>get the Des Plaines office not only to reallocate the payment but also
>to remove the late charges: Lincoln's done that before.

I pay four separate phone bills mailed to two addresses and with three
different billing names with a single check each month.  The bills
come in two batches, (three on a 969 prefix and one on a 961 prefix)
one week apart.  I have never had Pac Bell incorrectly process my
payment (knock on wood).  


Michael Spann      mikes@gammalink.com 
Voice: +1-408-744-1430	Fax: +1-408-744-1549 
UUCP: ...!uunet!gammafax!mikes    CIS: 73747,441