Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!bionet!hayes.ims.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: hpubvwa!ssc!Tad.Cook@beaver.cs.washington.edu Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: MCI and Sprint Pitch 800 Service to Households Message-ID: <13938@accuvax.nwu.edu> Date: 22 Oct 90 22:41:49 GMT Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu Organization: TELECOM Digest Lines: 34 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 756, Message 7 of 12 In article <13749@accuvax.nwu.edu>, CAPEK%YKTVMT.BITNET (Peter G. Capek) writes: > {The Wall Street Journal} of October 16 has an article describing > recent announcements by MCI and Sprint of new programs to market 800 > service to residences. Highlights: > Apparently in either case, MCI customers get will get a > four-digit private security code to avoid the reception of unwanted > calls. I think the REAL reason for the "security code" is in the next paragraph: > Observation: Isn't there a real potential for running out of numbers > here? There's really only one area code's worth of 800 numbers, and > several hundred thousand of those have been assigned already. If > these services are successful in any serious sort of way, I see a real > constraint. Even if it were technically feasible to add another area > code or two for "reverse bill" service, advertising it and getting > people to know, as they do today, that "1-800" is free would certainly > take a while. If MCI uses a four digit security code, then that is another 10,000 customers that can use the same 800 number. I am sure it will work something like this: You dial the number, and get a voice-mail-like prompt asking for the security code. The security code actually routes you to the correct party. Tad Cook Seattle, WA Packet: KT7H @ N7HFZ.WA.USA.NA Phone: 206/527-4089 MCI Mail: 3288544 Telex: 6503288544 MCI UW USENET:...uw-beaver!sumax!amc-gw!ssc!tad or, tad@ssc.UUCP