Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Some interesting novice questions from a novice guy
Message-ID: <L3O6IN7@xds13.ferranti.com>
Date: 25 Oct 90 22:24:44 GMT
References: <14488.27252b63@max.u.washington.edu> <3553@idunno.Princeton.EDU>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 11

In article <3553@idunno.Princeton.EDU> pfalstad@shine.Princeton.EDU (Paul John Falstad) writes:
> 	while (*ptr++) { /* warning: confusion ahead */
> 		DO_ABSOLUTELY_NOTHING ; /* Note: I meant to do this */
> 		} /* no more confusion, you can relax now */

I saw this discussion. Doesn't make sense. Doesn't anyone use:

	while(*foo++)
		continue;

anymore?
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
+1 713 274 5180.   'U`
peter@ferranti.com