Xref: utzoo comp.lang.fortran:3974 comp.sys.sgi:6397
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cica!iuvax!news!agni.cc.nd.edu!milind
From: milind@agni.cc.nd.edu (Milind Saraph)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,comp.sys.sgi
Subject: Re: archiving block data subroutines...
Message-ID: <541@news.nd.edu>
Date: 22 Oct 90 21:42:14 GMT
References: <1990Oct22.033107.5159@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Sender: news@news.nd.edu
Reply-To: milind@agni.cc.nd.edu (Milind Saraph)
Followup-To: comp.lang.fortran
Distribution: comp
Organization: Univ. of Notre Dame
Lines: 35


|>
|>Hi -
|>
|>(stuff deleted)
|>
|>Archiving the block data subroutine does work elsewhere (at least on
computers
|>running BSD4.3).  It does not work on our SGI Personal Iris, (running
|>IRIX version 3.2 I believe - but am not positive...  I can find out if it
|>makes a difference).
|>
|>Is this a problem with SGI's archiver, or archivers on machines running
|>System V-like operating systems in general?  We do not have a "ranlib"
|>program on the SGI;  the "ar" program creates the symbol tables that the
|>loader needs (we can call normal subroutines that have been archived and
|>it works fine).
|>
|>Thanks,
|>Jeff
|>
|>--
|>/*********************************************************************
**********
|>** Jeff Biesiadecki           ** University of Illinois,
Urbana-Champaign    **
|>** jeffb@aquifer.las.uiuc.edu ** Departments of Geology and Computer
Science **
|>**********************************************************************
*********/
                              
This has certainly been a problem on Stellar and Ardent machines (SYS-V like
OS).

-- milind