Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway
From: S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.UK (Steve Kille)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400.gateway
Subject: Re: RFC-822 traces in X.400
Message-ID: <1734.656779234@UK.AC.UCL.CS>
Date: 24 Oct 90 14:50:33 GMT
Lines: 8
Approved: usenet@ICS.UCI.EDU
In-reply-to: Your message of 17 Oct 90 17:47:43 +0000. <MAC.90Oct17184743@greco.dit.upm.es>
Phone: +44-71-380-7294

As has been noted, most implemenations which claim to be 987 or 1148 are
rather incomplete.   Many drop trace.

As X.400 supplies a trace element, it seems preferable to map trace onto
this, rather than onto the extended body part.


Steve