Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!mcdphx!citek.mcdphx.mot.com!hbg6
From: hbg6@citek.mcdphx.mot.com
Newsgroups: comp.robotics
Subject: reality, was inclination sensors
Message-ID: <13851@mcdphx.phx.mcd.mot.com>
Date: 19 Oct 90 18:58:37 GMT
Sender: listen@mcdphx.phx.mcd.mot.com
Reply-To: hbg6@citek.mcdphx.mot.com
Organization: Motorola Microcomputer Division, Tempe, Az.
Lines: 25
Summary:
Expires:
References:<3717@media-lab.MEDIA.MIT.EDU> <10134@ubc-cs.UUCP> <GERRY.90Oct18113735@onion.frc.ri.cmu.edu>
Sender:
Followup-To:
Distribution:

In article <GERRY.90Oct18113735@onion.frc.ri.cmu.edu> gerry@frc2.frc.ri.cmu.edu (Gerry Roston) writes:
> [.....]
>If the answer to both questions is no, then the idead previously
>suggested will be fine, and you may learn something from your
>failures.
>
>However, if this is a "real" robot, you can not afford the 
                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>engineering time required to set up such a device.  Furthermore,
> [.....]

I was going to ignore this but...

"real" as opposed to what? I trust you are not relegating all amateur
built systems to the 'toy and amusement' heap. 

John

.....................................................................
reply to 'from' address; hbg6@citek.mcdphx.mot.com
NOT the 'sender' line address!
Someday my sysadm will decide this is a 'real' problem. :-)
.....................................................................
All opinions expressed are mine and not Motorolas, their loss.
.....................................................................