Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!usc!ucsd!ucbvax!THUMPER.BELLCORE.COM!nsb From: nsb@THUMPER.BELLCORE.COM (Nathaniel Borenstein) Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.andrew Subject: Re: Problem with ams Message-ID: Date: 23 Oct 90 13:37:51 GMT References: Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 19 Sigh... sounds like what you need is to separate the current AMS_NonAMSDelivery AndrewSetup option into two options, one that says you're not running AMS Delivery, and one that says you're allowing "+" validation anyway, or something like that. I suspect this wouldn't be too hard to do, because the only two things I'm sure you'd need to change are 1) the test on line 197 of overhead/mail/lib/locname.c, and 2) the test on line 1690 of ams/libs/ms/mswp.c. In both cases, these test to see if you're running AMS Delivery when you might prefer to have them testing for the new configuration value you would add. To actually add the new AndrewSetup option, you only need to change two files, overhead/mail/lib/mailconf.{c,h}. These changes should be pretty obvious. If you make these changes, you should probably post them where Craig & I can look them over, and then submit them to the ITC for consideration for future patches. -- Nathaniel