Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!van-bc!rsoft!mindlink!a186 From: a186@mindlink.UUCP (Harvey Taylor) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: CALL FOR LOCAL DISCUSSION: Split the c.s.a group more? Message-ID: <3589@mindlink.UUCP> Date: 18 Oct 90 23:13:46 GMT Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada Lines: 44 [ My $.02 for the line eater ] I think we should leave c.s.a.games, c.s.a.hardware & c.s.a.tech unchanged cause they ain't broke. comp.sys.amiga.hardware [unchanged] comp.sys.amiga.games [unchanged] comp.sys.amiga.tech [unchanged] rmgroup c.s.a and create comp.sys.amiga.misc comp.sys.amiga.applications comp.sys.amiga.trade [or .swap or .sale] comp.sys.amiga.multimedia comp.sys.amiga.announce [moderated] comp.sys.amiga.review [moderated] comp.unix.amiga [ after it is released ;-)] I don't think we need any more net.cops, official or not. There is another aspect I would like to bring up. On MindLink, Usenet appears as a regular BBS that just happens to have a message counter in the hundreds of thousands. I think we are the victims of some automated crossposting. I get the impression that some people's messages are put into every c.s.a.#? group by some intermediate node. I think I read somewhere this is done by a gate from the internet. [eg. Not to pick on you, but Ralph Seguin, we get every one of your messages in c.s.a.h, c.s.a & c.s.a.t. Is this by your design? Or is it an intermediate gate as I surmise?] If we do do the split, perhaps some care will have to be taken to make such routing software cognizant of the appropriate groups? To have a subset of messages copied into 7 or 10 groups would be ... difficult. -harvey "In order to become the master, the politician poses as the servant." -de Gaulle Harvey Taylor Meta Media Productions uunet!van-bc!rsoft!mindlink!Harvey_Taylor a186@mindlink.UUCP