Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!usc!apple!motcsd!mcdcup!mcdchg!ddsw1!corpane!sparks From: sparks@corpane.UUCP (John Sparks) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: New computer? Message-ID: <3396@corpane.UUCP> Date: 17 Oct 90 13:48:20 GMT References: <33440@nigel.ee.udel.edu> Organization: Corpane Industries Inc., Louisville, KY Lines: 40 S36666WB%ETSUACAD.BITNET@ricevm1.rice.edu (Brian Wright) writes: >As long as the lines of resolution don't go over around 500 then it is still >in the realm of NTSC. NTSC can supposedly handle 500 lines of resolution. Don't confuse lines of resolution when talking about TV, with pixels of resolution when talking about computers. They are different measurements. On computers when someone mentions resolution they are talking about how many pixels are shown on the screen in horizontal and vertical directions. But the term 'lines of resolution' on TV's came about long before there were such things as pixels. What they are referring to is how many separate black and white lines can be seen on a TV. Remember the old TV test patterns with all the lines and circles (like the Indian head one)? They would use this to measure how many lines could be seen on a screen and this became the lines of resolution Lines of resolution are also not to be confused with Scanlines which are how many horizontal scans are made by the electron beam on a CRT. In most cases the scanlines determine the horizontal lines of resolution (if there are 525 scanlines, you can't have 600 lines of horizontal resolution can you? but you could have less than 525). Most measurements of lines of resolution are reffering to the vertical resolution, though. Basically they are measuring how many alternating black and white dots can be seen on the screen before they start blurring together. So you can use a computer that does very high resolution to drive a NTSC (or PAL) screen, but you will lose some of the detail (small lines will blur together) A rough equivilant of Pixels to NTSC would be around 640 x 512. Anything higher would be a waste on NTSC as you would just start losing detail. Even with 640 x 512 you would be losing a lot of detail, NTSC is much blurrier than RGB. -- John Sparks |D.I.S.K. Public Access Unix System| Multi-User Games, Email sparks@corpane.UUCP |PH: (502) 968-DISK 24Hrs/2400BPS | Usenet, Chatting, =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-|7 line Multi-User system. | Downloads & more. A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of----Ogden Nash