Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ukma!phoenix
From: phoenix@ms.uky.edu (R'ykandar Korra'ti)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: CALL FOR LOCAL DISCUSSION Revision 1: Split the c.s.a group more?
Message-ID: <16214@s.ms.uky.edu>
Date: 20 Oct 90 13:13:06 GMT
References: <1990Oct19.231315.11667@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG>
Reply-To: phoenix@ms.uky.edu (R'ykandar Korra'ti)
Organization: El'n'tk National Spaceport, Mission Control
Lines: 18

[]
     I agree with the opinion that comp.sys.amiga definately needs splitting,
and I think the proposal listed here does an acceptable job of doing it. I'm
willing to vote for it as a package (though I'm not a big fan of
comp.sys.amiga.compare) in part simply because I'd like to get more hardware-
related traffic into comp.sys.amiga.hardware and out of c.s.a and c.s.a.t
(which I don't always read. :-) )
     I do wonder whether c.s.a.compare and c.s.a.emulations could be rolled
into one, since they both deal very much with the same thing. Any commentary on
that?
     Also, is someone willing to be a mailserver for each new c.s.a.#? group?
If not, there may be some individuals (on BITNET, etc) who miss out on material
as a result.
                                                        - R'ykandar.
-- 
R'ykandar Korra'ti | Editor, LOW ORBIT Science and Fiction
From TRHMS (Kermit); "They've got to sing 'The Time Warp' to WHAT?!"
phoenix@ms.uky.edu | editor@lorbit.UUCP | ukma!lorbit!editor | PLink: Skywise