Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tronsbox!bleys
From: bleys@tronsbox.xei.com (Bill Cavanaugh)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: CALL FOR LOCAL DISCUSSION Revision 1: Split the c.s.a group more?
Message-ID: <27214752-3082.2comp.sys.amiga-1@tronsbox.xei.com>
Date: 21 Oct 90 08:00:13 GMT
References: <1990Oct19.231315.11667@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <16214@s.ms.uky.edu>
Lines: 31

>----------
>  Resp: 1 of 1 by [R'ykandar Korra'ti]
>  Date: Sat Oct 20 1990 19:02 
>  Lines:18
>16214@s.ms.uky.edu
>
>[]
>     I agree with the opinion that comp.sys.amiga definately needs splitting,
>and I think the proposal listed here does an acceptable job of doing it. I'm
>willing to vote for it as a package (though I'm not a big fan of
>comp.sys.amiga.compare) in part simply because I'd like to get more hardware-
>related traffic into comp.sys.amiga.hardware and out of c.s.a and c.s.a.t
>(which I don't always read. :-) )
>     I do wonder whether c.s.a.compare and c.s.a.emulations could be rolled
>into one, since they both deal very much with the same thing. Any commentary
>
>                                                        - R'ykandar.
>-- 
>R'ykandar Korra'ti | Editor, LOW ORBIT Science and Fiction
>From TRHMS (Kermit); "They've got to sing 'The Time Warp' to WHAT?!"
>phoenix@ms.uky.edu | editor@lorbit.UUCP | ukma!lorbit!editor | PLink: Skywise

I'm in 100% agreement with R'ykandar.  I'll gladly vote for the proposals,
but feel that rolling emulations in with "c.s.a.compare" (anybody got an
idea for a more intuitively understandable name?) would mean one less group
to get pased, and the two subjects >are< uniquely related...

/****************************************************************
 *          All of the above copyright by the below.            *
 *         Bill Cavanaugh       uunet!tronsbox!bleys            *
 *    "A language is a dialect with an army and a navy."        *
 ****************************************************************/