Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!fernwood!portal!apple!vsi1!zorch!xanthian From: xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: CALL FOR LOCAL DISCUSSION Revision 1: Split the c.s.a group more? Message-ID: <1990Oct21.094201.11216@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> Date: 21 Oct 90 09:42:01 GMT References: <1990Oct19.231315.11667@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <16214@s.ms.uky.edu> Organization: SF-Bay Public-Access Unix Lines: 30 In article <16214@s.ms.uky.edu> phoenix@ms.uky.edu (R'ykandar Korra'ti) writes: >[] > I agree with the opinion that comp.sys.amiga definately needs splitting, >and I think the proposal listed here does an acceptable job of doing it. I'm >willing to vote for it as a package (though I'm not a big fan of >comp.sys.amiga.compare) in part simply because I'd like to get more hardware- >related traffic into comp.sys.amiga.hardware and out of c.s.a and c.s.a.t >(which I don't always read. :-) ) Thanks. That's one of the goals > I do wonder whether c.s.a.compare and c.s.a.emulations could be rolled >into one, since they both deal very much with the same thing. Any commentary on >that? Well, folks who want to read and post about AMAX II (not me!) still probably don't want to read the MB-memorial postings for which .compare is intended. Little time as I personally have for emulations, I think the folks who _are_ interested deserve the same relief from wading through the religous wars as do the multimedia gurus, e.g. > Also, is someone willing to be a mailserver for each new c.s.a.#? group? >If not, there may be some individuals (on BITNET, etc) who miss out on material >as a result. I'm trying to arrange that with udel.edu; I can't even get a response from postmaster, root, or amiga-relay-request there so far. Any suggestions? Kent, the man from xanth.