Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!psuvm!jkt100
From: JKT100@psuvm.psu.edu (JKT)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: CAD for Amiga, actually much simpler..
Message-ID: <90294.202528JKT100@psuvm.psu.edu>
Date: 22 Oct 90 00:25:28 GMT
References: <33798@nigel.ee.udel.edu>
Organization: Penn State University
Lines: 23

In article <33798@nigel.ee.udel.edu>, fhwri%CONNCOLL.BITNET@cunyvm.cuny.edu
says:
>
>I agree; Pagestream is a winner. 2.0 is even better than 1.8, although
>the Compugraphic fonts are a LOT slower printing to the screen. The
>dotmatrix output is MUCH faster than ProPage. If you're interested in
>DTP on the Amiga, by all means give Pagestream a look.

Please address the problem with Compugraphic font incompatibility.  I
am of the understanding that, even though I own ProPage 1.31 and have
a lot of Compugraphic fonts for it, they cannot be used with PageStream
2.0?  I have to buy the same fonts all over again, only in Pagestream
format??

                                                            Kurt
--
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|| Kurt Tappe   (215) 363-9485  || Amigas, Macs, IBM's, C-64's, NeXTs, ||
|| 184 W. Valley Hill Rd.       ||  Apple ]['s....  I use 'em all.     ||
|| Malvern, PA 19355-2214       ||  (and in that order too!   ;-)      ||
||  jkt100@psuvm.psu.edu         --------------------------------------||
||  jkt100@psuvm.bitnet  jkt100%psuvm.bitnet@psuvax1  QLink: KurtTappe ||
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------