Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!ucsd!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!xanthian
From: xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Why not use RAD:? (Re:  ASDG VD0: DOES NOT WORK!)
Message-ID: <1990Oct22.033330.22005@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG>
Date: 22 Oct 90 03:33:30 GMT
References: <46200136@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> <9307@helios.TAMU.EDU> <dave.5392@aquarium.buffalo.ny.us>
Organization: SF-Bay Public-Access Unix
Lines: 17

I'm really curious at all this VD0: and VK0: traffic. I've been using
the RAD: that Commodore supplies for eighteen months or so with no
problems whatever, and except for a couple of times when I was running
some really braindead demo code, that trashed it thoroughly, it's never
failed to recover for me. I use a 6.5 meg RAD: every day, sloshing files
around like crazy while multitasking for all I'm worth.

Why are people still searching for a recoverable ram disk? "It's in
there!" If there's something horribly wrong with RAD:, I'm not sure I
want to know at this late date. Is my computer about to develop dry rot
or something?

;-)
                                                           /// It's Amiga
                                                          /// for me:  why
Kent, the man from xanth.                             \\\///   settle for
<xanthian@Zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <xanthian@well.sf.ca.us>   \XX/  anything less?