Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!timbuk!cs.umn.edu!ub.d.umn.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!dsl.pitt.edu!pitt!cs.pitt.edu!planting
From: planting@cs.pitt.edu (Professor Harry Plantinga)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Macs etc.
Message-ID: <8934@pitt.UUCP>
Date: 22 Oct 90 13:44:28 GMT
Sender: news@pitt.UUCP
Organization: University of Pittsburgh
Lines: 21
References:<901016.15214734.033391@CMR.CP6> <15198@cbmvax.commodore.com>

In article <15198@cbmvax.commodore.com> daveh@cbmvax.commodore.com (Dave 
Haynie) writes:
> 
> The A3000, as shipped, supports higher resolution than any Mac straight
> from Apple.  There are a number of high resolution boards for the Mac, 
which
> is an advantage to those who need them.  And they do support more colors.
> But they have no resolution advantage.
> 
> Dave Haynie Commodore-Amiga (Amiga 3000) "The Crew That Never Rests"

Ooo ooo, now the disinformation is coming straight from Commodore!  Does 
the A3000, as shipped, come with better resolution than my Mac II, with an 
Apple 21" 1152x870x8-bit grayscale monitor and an Apple 13" 640x480x24-bit color monitor?

It doesn't come cheap, though; the total educational price at my university for these two monitors and the associated video cards is $2546.


----------
Harry Plantinga
planting@cs.pitt.edu