Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!bagate!cbmvax!cbmehq!cbmdeo!adspdk!hclausen
From: hclausen@adspdk.UUCP (Henrik Clausen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: CALL FOR LOCAL DISCUSSION Revision 1: Split the c.s.a group more?
Message-ID: <1816786c.ARN03589@adspdk.UUCP>
Date: 22 Oct 90 08:10:04 GMT
References: <1990Oct19.231315.11667@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG>
Reply-To: hclausen@adspdk.UUCP
Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga
Organization: Graffiti Data
Lines: 32

In article <1990Oct19.231315.11667@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG>, Kent Paul Dolan writes:

> There's a lot of this, please read it all before posting responses.

   OK :-)

> I hope people will vote for the proposal even though they personally
> handle the traffic in c.s.a just fine and think having a dozen new
> groups in their .newsrc or whatever would be the pits.  The group size
> is causing lots of problems at lots of sites.

   So true. I can't imagine following c.s.a for the next month, but I do
want to vote ('Yes').

   Perhaps a mailing list could be set up for the CFV's?


> I hope people will vote for the proposal in toto.

   This here Rev. 1 proposal seems good to me, including nuking c.s.a!
Perhaps a dislike for the .compare group, but it sure seems needed...

> When the vote comes, pull the c.s.a party lever.

   Will be awaiting CFV eagerly.


                                     -Henrik

|            Henrik Clausen, Graffiti Data (Fido: 2:230/22.33)           |
|           ...{pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!cbmehq!adspdk!hclausen           |
\__"Do not accept the heart that is the slave to reason" - Qawwali trad__/