Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!uunet!van-bc!
From: lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca (Larry Phillips)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: CALL FOR LOCAL DISCUSSION Revision 1: Split the c.s.a group more?
Message-ID: <2151@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca>
Date: 22 Oct 90 11:19:15 GMT
Lines: 24
Return-Path: <lpami!lphillips>
To: van-bc!rnews

In <591@DIALix.oz.au>, bernie@DIALix.oz.au (Bernd Felsche) writes:
>
>All those UNIX readers, who wouldn't give Amiga (that toy? ;-) a
>second look, will be confronted with a query as to whether they want
>to subscribe to comp.UNIX.amiga.  They never looked inside c.s.a, or
>gave up because of the volume.
>
>Given the alternative comp.sys.AMIGA.unix, which do you they're more
>likely to subscribe to? (Ignore any penchant for Amigas, it's
>difficult, I know.)

I strongly agree with this.

-larry


--
It is not possible to both understand and appreciate Intel CPUs.
    -D.Wolfskill
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ 
|   //   Larry Phillips                                                 |
| \X/    lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca -or- uunet!van-bc!lpami!lphillips |
|        COMPUSERVE: 76703,4322  -or-  76703.4322@compuserve.com        |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+