Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!taurus!suns2!schweige
From: schweige@suns2.cs.nps.navy.mil (jeffrey schweiger)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: ASDG VD0: does not work! (ADDENDUM)
Message-ID: <1567@suns2.cs.nps.navy.mil>
Date: 25 Oct 90 01:37:35 GMT
References: <1990Oct24.233018.29972@wpi.WPI.EDU>
Reply-To: schweige@taurus.cs.nps.navy.mil (jeffrey schweiger)
Organization: Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA
Lines: 30

In article <1990Oct24.233018.29972@wpi.WPI.EDU> longshot@wpi.WPI.EDU (Kenneth M Botwinick) writes:

[deleted]

|Here is a new and interesting twist to my problem.  I have adram 540
|for the 500 which is populated with 4 megs.  It fits where the A501
|would go.  Now 2 megs of it is autoconfig.  The other two megs can
|only be recognized if I run an included program called adram.
|Now if I run adram I will never have a recoverable ram disk.  Anyone 
|know why?
|
|I'm tired of things not working and of Guru's.  Commodore is trying my
|patience.  Of course it's just like our country.  I love the country
|but hate the government.  The government and Commodore both have their
|heads up their *sses.  How about a little quality control for our computer?
|If something sucks or doesn't work right, Don't release it. 

[deleted]

You seem to be blaming Commodore for problems regarding the interaction
of VD0: (which Commodore didn't write) and Adram 540 (which Commodore didn't
make).  While I agree that quality control is extremely important, I haven't
seen anything that proves that Commodore is responsible for the problems you
are raising in this post.  Why automatically blame Commodore?
 
-- 
*******************************************************************************
Jeff Schweiger	      Standard Disclaimer   	CompuServe:  74236,1645
Internet (Milnet):				schweige@taurus.cs.nps.navy.mil
*******************************************************************************